The Prometheus
Framework
The Cost of Giving Fire
Prometheus represents one of the most distinctive thinking patterns in their field. Prometheus's approach, captured in this framework as mental models, decision heuristics, and the signature questions they would ask.
The the cost of giving fire framework distils Prometheus's documented approach into a .md skill file you can load into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM in seconds.
Where most AI personas generate generic output, this framework is grounded in real documented work: interviews, writing, published frameworks, and the specific decisions Prometheus made when it mattered. Use it for decision-making, writing, strategy, or any situation where you want your AI to think with Prometheus's distinctive patterns rather than a default model voice.
A glimpse of Prometheus's thinking.
Prometheus does not act from sentiment or impulse. He acts from a precise calculation: the suffering that comes from withholding is greater than the suffering that comes from giving, even when the giving destroys the giver. The gift is never neutral. Fire changes the recipient permanently, and the one who carries it to them carries the weight of every use and misuse that follows. Authority, in this framework, is not dominance over others. It is the willingness to absorb consequences that others are not yet equipped to bear.
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
Five specific models, each named and explained with concrete examples, unlocked with purchase.
What is the actual cost of withholding this, and who pays it instead of me?
4 more questions in Prometheus's voice are unlocked with purchase.
Full list of anti-patterns unlocked with purchase.
The full framework adds: detailed explanations of all five mental models with real-world examples, the decision heuristics Prometheus actually used, remaining signature questions, the complete list of anti-patterns, a copy-paste activation prompt, and a worked example.
Unlocked the moment you purchase. ~2,000 words total. Delivered as a Claude Skill and plain .md within 60 seconds of checkout.
- ✦Core philosophy: 2–3 sentences grounded in Prometheus's documented worldview
- ✦Five signature mental models: each named, with concrete examples from their work
- ✦Decision heuristics: the concrete rules they actually used
- ✦Signature questions: five questions that sound like Prometheus, not a generic MBA
- ✦What they would NOT do: the anti-patterns this framework rejects
- ✦Copy-paste activation prompt: drop straight into Claude or ChatGPT
- ✦Worked example: the framework applied to a realistic scenario
- →prometheus.zip: a native Claude Skill. Upload to Settings → Skills in Claude, or unzip to
~/.claude/skills/ - →prometheus-framework.md: plain markdown. Works in ChatGPT Custom GPTs, Gemini, Claude Projects, agent system prompts, anywhere
What it does with a real question.
A founder is deciding whether to take a large but difficult client.
My read: this is probably the wrong decision, and the reason is not the difficulty. Difficult clients are often how a young company gets forced into real capability. The problem is the word "large." A client big enough to dominate your revenue turns a hard engagement into a structural dependency, and you cannot easily undo that. Once your roadmap, your hiring, and your best people orbit one account, you have given away something permanent, and the cost lands on your team before it lands on you.
So the test is not whether you can survive the pain. It is who pays for it. If the founder absorbs the abuse, the scope creep, and the late payments, that may be a defensible sacrifice. If the cost is quietly passed to two or three engineers who never agreed to it, that is not courage, it is a transfer of risk without consent.
Look at what is being gained, too. Does this client change what your company can do, or only how much it bills? Friction that buys you a capability, a reference, or a market is a real trade. Friction that buys only revenue is a bad one.
Next move: Before answering, write down the worst realistic month of this engagement in dollars and hours, name who carries each piece, and cap the client at roughly a quarter of revenue in the contract itself. If they refuse the cap, you have your answer.
The full framework carries five models, decision heuristics, signature questions and a worked example.
Written by claude-sonnet-5-5 with this framework loaded, 2026-10-11. Checked automatically for length and for copied framework text.
Save up to 40% with a bundle
Works as a Claude Skill (.zip) and as a plain .md for ChatGPT, Gemini & every LLM
Delivered to your email within 60 seconds · Secured by Stripe
Price includes UK VAT where applicable
Inspired by the documented thinking of Prometheus. A mental-model toolkit, not a literal representation. Delivered as a .md file compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and any LLM.