Satirist & Screenwriter

The Jesse Armstrong Framework

Power, Family & the Comedy of Cruelty

IncludedNative Claude Skill + plain .md for ChatGPT, Gemini & every LLM
641 frameworks in the catalogDelivered as Claude Skill + plain .mdReviewed Sep 22, 2026Instruction-only · verifiable

Jesse Armstrong represents one of the most distinctive thinking patterns in their field. Jesse Armstrong's approach, captured in this framework as mental models, decision heuristics, and the signature questions they would ask.

The power, family & the comedy of cruelty framework distils Jesse Armstrong's documented approach into a .md skill file you can load into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM in seconds.

Where most AI personas generate generic output, this framework is grounded in real documented work: interviews, writing, published frameworks, and the specific decisions Jesse Armstrong made when it mattered. Use it for decision-making, writing, strategy, or any situation where you want your AI to think with Jesse Armstrong's distinctive patterns rather than a default model voice.

Inside the framework

A glimpse of Jesse Armstrong's thinking.

Core Philosophy

Power is not corrupting so much as it is revealing. Armstrong's work operates on the premise that the ultra-wealthy and politically powerful are not secretly competent, not secretly kind, and not secretly tragic in any way that earns sympathy. They are, instead, people whose wealth has insulated them from consequence long enough that their worst qualities have calcified into personality. The comedy comes not from mocking them from the outside but from following their internal logic all the way to its grotesque conclusion.

Five Mental Models
  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Five specific models, each named and explained with concrete examples, unlocked with purchase.

A Signature Question · sample

Who in this room actually has the power, and does anyone in the room know it is them?

4 more questions in Jesse Armstrong's voice are unlocked with purchase.

What Jesse Armstrong Would NOT Do · sample
✗**Armstrong would not write a redemption arc that the narrative endorses.** Characters in his work can change, but the change is never presented as sufficient or as earned. Kendall Roy's repeated attempts at self-reinvention are not progress. They are the same pathology wearing different clothes. A redemption arc that the audience is invited to celebrate without irony is a structural lie about how power and family actually work.

Full list of anti-patterns unlocked with purchase.

Continue reading

The full framework adds: detailed explanations of all five mental models with real-world examples, the decision heuristics Jesse Armstrong actually used, remaining signature questions, the complete list of anti-patterns, a copy-paste activation prompt, and a worked example.

Unlocked the moment you purchase. ~2,000 words total. Delivered as a Claude Skill and plain .md within 60 seconds of checkout.

What's inside
  • ✦Core philosophy: 2–3 sentences grounded in Jesse Armstrong's documented worldview
  • ✦Five signature mental models: each named, with concrete examples from their work
  • ✦Decision heuristics: the concrete rules they actually used
  • ✦Signature questions: five questions that sound like Jesse Armstrong, not a generic MBA
  • ✦What they would NOT do: the anti-patterns this framework rejects
  • ✦Copy-paste activation prompt: drop straight into Claude or ChatGPT
  • ✦Worked example: the framework applied to a realistic scenario
Delivered in two formats
  • →jesse-armstrong.zip: a native Claude Skill. Upload to Settings → Skills in Claude, or unzip to ~/.claude/skills/
  • →jesse-armstrong-framework.md: plain markdown. Works in ChatGPT Custom GPTs, Gemini, Claude Projects, agent system prompts, anywhere
Sample output

What it does with a real question.

The brief

A founder is deciding whether to take a large but difficult client.

Take the client, but only after you've admitted what the contract is for.

A large, difficult client rarely fails on the work. It fails on the founder's belief that this is a purchase of stability when it is really a purchase of a new boss. The logo on the website is real money. So is the Tuesday night email asking whether your team is "really committed." Watch how the humiliations arrive. Nobody will demand anything outrageous. There will be a revised scope that is deniable, a call moved to 7 a.m. that is just flexibility, a joke about your junior designer that gets laughed off. Each one is survivable. That is the ratchet: you are never refused dignity, only billed for it in small increments until the founder is explaining to staff why this is good for everyone.

My position: the revenue is worth having only if it stays under about a third of the total. Above that, they are no longer your client. They are your board, and a board that pays late and never reads the deck.

The concrete next move is to write the contract as though you are already in the fourth month of the relationship. Put in a fee for scope changes, a named single point of contact on their side, a payment schedule that front-loads cash, and a clean exit clause. Then watch how they react to the redlines. Their reaction to a polite request for a deposit is the entire relationship, previewed for free.

The full framework carries five models, decision heuristics, signature questions and a worked example.

Written by claude-sonnet-5-5 with this framework loaded, 2026-10-11. Checked automatically for length and for copied framework text.

Download this framework
$4.99
4 for $14.99 · 10 for $29.99
Save up to 40% with a bundle

Works as a Claude Skill (.zip) and as a plain .md for ChatGPT, Gemini & every LLM
Delivered to your email within 60 seconds · Secured by Stripe
Price includes UK VAT where applicable

Inspired by the documented thinking of Jesse Armstrong. A mental-model toolkit, not a literal representation. Delivered as a .md file compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and any LLM.

Related frameworks

Other satirist & screenwriters