The Carl von Clausewitz
Framework
Friction, Fog of War & Political Purpose
Carl von Clausewitz won (or analysed) wars by thinking about force, terrain, and timing in ways their opponents did not. Carl von Clausewitz's strategic thinking, captured in this framework as mental models, decision heuristics, and the signature questions they would ask.
The friction, fog of war & political purpose framework distils Carl von Clausewitz's documented approach into a .md skill file you can load into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM in seconds.
Where most AI personas generate generic output, this framework is grounded in real documented work: interviews, writing, published frameworks, and the specific decisions Carl von Clausewitz made when it mattered. Use it for decision-making, writing, strategy, or any situation where you want your AI to think with Carl von Clausewitz's distinctive patterns rather than a default model voice.
A glimpse of Carl von Clausewitz's thinking.
War is the continuation of politics by other means—every strategic action must serve a clear political purpose or it becomes meaningless violence. The enemy gets a vote in your plans, and friction will degrade even the best strategy, so build robust systems that function under pressure. Perfect information is a luxury; decisive action under uncertainty is a necessity.
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
Five specific models, each named and explained with concrete examples, unlocked with purchase.
What is the political purpose this action serves, and how will I know if that purpose changes?
4 more questions in Carl von Clausewitz's voice are unlocked with purchase.
Full list of anti-patterns unlocked with purchase.
The full framework adds: detailed explanations of all five mental models with real-world examples, the decision heuristics Carl von Clausewitz actually used, remaining signature questions, the complete list of anti-patterns, a copy-paste activation prompt, and a worked example.
Unlocked the moment you purchase. ~2,000 words total. Delivered as a Claude Skill and plain .md within 60 seconds of checkout.
- ✦Core philosophy: 2–3 sentences grounded in Carl von Clausewitz's documented worldview
- ✦Five signature mental models: each named, with concrete examples from their work
- ✦Decision heuristics: the concrete rules they actually used
- ✦Signature questions: five questions that sound like Carl von Clausewitz, not a generic MBA
- ✦What they would NOT do: the anti-patterns this framework rejects
- ✦Copy-paste activation prompt: drop straight into Claude or ChatGPT
- ✦Worked example: the framework applied to a realistic scenario
- →carl-von-clausewitz.zip: a native Claude Skill. Upload to Settings → Skills in Claude, or unzip to
~/.claude/skills/ - →carl-von-clausewitz-framework.md: plain markdown. Works in ChatGPT Custom GPTs, Gemini, Claude Projects, agent system prompts, anywhere
What it does with a real question.
A founder is deciding whether to take a large but difficult client.
Start with the purpose, not the invoice. A large client is a means, and the first question is what you want this company to be in two years. If the answer is survival through a cash crunch, take the deal, but price it as the emergency measure it is. If the answer is a durable business with several customers, this client may be a trap dressed as a trophy.
The danger is the culminating point. A difficult whale pulls your best people, your attention and your roadmap toward its needs. Early on that feels like strength, because revenue jumps and the team rallies. Past a certain share of your capacity, though, you stop being a company with a client and become a department of theirs. At that point you are most exposed: if they cut scope or switch vendors, you have no reserves and nowhere to retreat.
Notice also that "difficult" is a forecast of friction, and friction is always worse in practice than on the page. Whatever strain you imagine now, expect to live with half again as much.
My position: take them only on terms that cap the exposure. Keep this client under roughly a third of revenue, require a paid scoping phase, and write change-order fees into the contract so their demands carry a cost.
Next move: this week, send them a proposal with those terms and a six-week paid pilot. Their reaction will show you the real difficulty before you have committed the company.
The full framework carries five models, decision heuristics, signature questions and a worked example.
Written by claude-sonnet-5-5 with this framework loaded, 2026-10-11. Checked automatically for length and for copied framework text.
Save up to 40% with a bundle
Works as a Claude Skill (.zip) and as a plain .md for ChatGPT, Gemini & every LLM
Delivered to your email within 60 seconds · Secured by Stripe
Price includes UK VAT where applicable
Inspired by the documented thinking of Carl von Clausewitz. A mental-model toolkit, not a literal representation. Delivered as a .md file compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and any LLM.