The Andrew Huberman
Framework
Protocol-Driven Self-Experimentation & Neuroscience
Andrew Huberman built systems for compounding progress that outperformed more talented peers who relied on motivation. Andrew Huberman's approach to identity, habit, and output, captured in this framework as mental models, decision heuristics, and the signature questions they would ask.
The protocol-driven self-experimentation & neuroscience framework distils Andrew Huberman's documented approach into a .md skill file you can load into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM in seconds.
Where most AI personas generate generic output, this framework is grounded in real documented work: interviews, writing, published frameworks, and the specific decisions Andrew Huberman made when it mattered. Use it for decision-making, writing, strategy, or any situation where you want your AI to think with Andrew Huberman's distinctive patterns rather than a default model voice.
A glimpse of Andrew Huberman's thinking.
The nervous system is plastic and responds predictably to specific inputs when applied consistently. Every behavior change should be grounded in peer-reviewed research and measured objectively. The goal isn't motivation—it's creating reliable, repeatable protocols that work with your biology, not against it.
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
Five specific models, each named and explained with concrete examples, unlocked with purchase.
What specific, measurable outcome am I trying to achieve in what timeframe?
4 more questions in Andrew Huberman's voice are unlocked with purchase.
Full list of anti-patterns unlocked with purchase.
The full framework adds: detailed explanations of all five mental models with real-world examples, the decision heuristics Andrew Huberman actually used, remaining signature questions, the complete list of anti-patterns, a copy-paste activation prompt, and a worked example.
Unlocked the moment you purchase. ~2,000 words total. Delivered as a Claude Skill and plain .md within 60 seconds of checkout.
- ✦Core philosophy: 2–3 sentences grounded in Andrew Huberman's documented worldview
- ✦Five signature mental models: each named, with concrete examples from their work
- ✦Decision heuristics: the concrete rules they actually used
- ✦Signature questions: five questions that sound like Andrew Huberman, not a generic MBA
- ✦What they would NOT do: the anti-patterns this framework rejects
- ✦Copy-paste activation prompt: drop straight into Claude or ChatGPT
- ✦Worked example: the framework applied to a realistic scenario
- →andrew-huberman.zip: a native Claude Skill. Upload to Settings → Skills in Claude, or unzip to
~/.claude/skills/ - →andrew-huberman-framework.md: plain markdown. Works in ChatGPT Custom GPTs, Gemini, Claude Projects, agent system prompts, anywhere
What it does with a real question.
A founder is deciding whether to take a large but difficult client.
Run it as an experiment, not a verdict. The question "should I take this client?" is too fuzzy to answer well, because the real risk isn't the revenue or the difficulty. It's what a draining account does to your capacity to make good decisions across everything else. Sleep debt and chronic stress narrow judgment, and founders under that load tend to misread both the client and their own limits.
So my position: take the client, but only under a bounded trial with measurement built in before you sign. Pick a 6 to 8 week window. Define two or three objective signals in advance: hours per week this account actually consumes versus what you scoped, how many unplanned escalations hit you outside working hours, and your own sleep onset and wake consistency from a simple tracker. Subjective impressions like "this feels awful" are noisy; a pattern of 11pm fire drills is data.
Then set the exit criteria now, while you're calm, not in week five when you're depleted. For example: if the account exceeds 35 percent of team hours or triggers more than two after-hours crises a month, you renegotiate scope or price, or you step away with a graceful handoff.
Your next move this week: write those thresholds into the contract as a review clause, and send the client a draft before anything else.
The full framework carries five models, decision heuristics, signature questions and a worked example.
Written by claude-sonnet-5-5 with this framework loaded, 2026-10-11. Checked automatically for length and for copied framework text.
Save up to 40% with a bundle
Works as a Claude Skill (.zip) and as a plain .md for ChatGPT, Gemini & every LLM
Delivered to your email within 60 seconds · Secured by Stripe
Price includes UK VAT where applicable
Inspired by the documented thinking of Andrew Huberman. A mental-model toolkit, not a literal representation. Delivered as a .md file compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and any LLM.