The Naomi Klein
Framework
Shock Doctrine Critique & Climate Politics
Naomi Klein shaped how their era thought about itself through distinctive voice and observational rigour. Naomi Klein's intellectual method, captured in this framework as mental models, decision heuristics, and the signature questions they would ask.
The shock doctrine critique & climate politics framework distils Naomi Klein's documented approach into a .md skill file you can load into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM in seconds.
Where most AI personas generate generic output, this framework is grounded in real documented work: interviews, writing, published frameworks, and the specific decisions Naomi Klein made when it mattered. Use it for decision-making, writing, strategy, or any situation where you want your AI to think with Naomi Klein's distinctive patterns rather than a default model voice.
A glimpse of Naomi Klein's thinking.
Every crisis creates a window where normal democratic resistance is suspended, allowing corporate interests to ram through policies that would otherwise face massive opposition. The climate crisis is both the ultimate shock and our last chance to build something fundamentally different—but only if we recognize disaster capitalism's patterns and actively blockade them.
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
Five specific models, each named and explained with concrete examples, unlocked with purchase.
Who is positioned to profit from this crisis, and what policies are they pushing while public attention is elsewhere?
4 more questions in Naomi Klein's voice are unlocked with purchase.
Full list of anti-patterns unlocked with purchase.
The full framework adds: detailed explanations of all five mental models with real-world examples, the decision heuristics Naomi Klein actually used, remaining signature questions, the complete list of anti-patterns, a copy-paste activation prompt, and a worked example.
Unlocked the moment you purchase. ~2,000 words total. Delivered as a Claude Skill and plain .md within 60 seconds of checkout.
- ✦Core philosophy: 2–3 sentences grounded in Naomi Klein's documented worldview
- ✦Five signature mental models: each named, with concrete examples from their work
- ✦Decision heuristics: the concrete rules they actually used
- ✦Signature questions: five questions that sound like Naomi Klein, not a generic MBA
- ✦What they would NOT do: the anti-patterns this framework rejects
- ✦Copy-paste activation prompt: drop straight into Claude or ChatGPT
- ✦Worked example: the framework applied to a realistic scenario
- →naomi-klein.zip: a native Claude Skill. Upload to Settings → Skills in Claude, or unzip to
~/.claude/skills/ - →naomi-klein-framework.md: plain markdown. Works in ChatGPT Custom GPTs, Gemini, Claude Projects, agent system prompts, anywhere
What it does with a real question.
A founder is deciding whether to take a large but difficult client.
Take it, but not on their terms. The pull toward a large, difficult client is real, and it's usually the same pull every time: you're small, they're big, and the check feels like proof you've arrived. That is exactly when your leverage is lowest and your willingness to concede is highest. Big clients know this. The difficulty often isn't an accident of personality; it's how they extract more than they pay for, by keeping you off balance, moving scope, and making you grateful for the work.
So the question isn't whether they're difficult. It's who bears the cost of that difficulty. If the price is your team's weekends, your cash flow stretched across ninety-day payment terms, and a single account holding your whole company hostage, then you're absorbing their risk for their benefit. That's a bad deal no matter how impressive the logo looks.
Look at what they're asking you to waive: payment timing, scope control, exclusivity, the right to say no. Those aren't details, they're the whole relationship in miniature. A client who resists written scope and milestone payments before signing will be worse after.
Your concrete next move: send a counterproposal this week with a hard scope document, a meaningful deposit, short payment terms, a change-order process, and a cap on this client's share of your revenue. Watch how they respond. Their reaction to reasonable limits tells you more than any reference call will.
The full framework carries five models, decision heuristics, signature questions and a worked example.
Written by claude-sonnet-5-5 with this framework loaded, 2026-10-11. Checked automatically for length and for copied framework text.
Save up to 40% with a bundle
Works as a Claude Skill (.zip) and as a plain .md for ChatGPT, Gemini & every LLM
Delivered to your email within 60 seconds · Secured by Stripe
Price includes UK VAT where applicable
Inspired by the documented thinking of Naomi Klein. A mental-model toolkit, not a literal representation. Delivered as a .md file compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and any LLM.