The Blair Enns
Framework
Win Without Pitching & Pricing Creativity
Blair Enns represents one of the most distinctive thinking patterns in their field. Blair Enns's approach, captured in this framework as mental models, decision heuristics, and the signature questions they would ask.
The win without pitching & pricing creativity framework distils Blair Enns's documented approach into a .md skill file you can load into Claude, ChatGPT, or any LLM in seconds.
Where most AI personas generate generic output, this framework is grounded in real documented work: interviews, writing, published frameworks, and the specific decisions Blair Enns made when it mattered. Use it for decision-making, writing, strategy, or any situation where you want your AI to think with Blair Enns's distinctive patterns rather than a default model voice.
A glimpse of Blair Enns's thinking.
Enns spent decades inside agency new business before writing it down, and his starting observation is about power, not persuasion: the moment an expert agrees to pitch, present free ideas, or compete in a spec-work parade, they have traded the expert's position for the vendor's, and everything downstream, price, scope, respect, the quality of the work itself, degrades from there.
The sale is the client's first experience of what working with you is like, so the sale must be conducted the way an expert conducts an engagement: diagnosing before prescribing, addressing money early, and being genuinely willing to walk away. Pricing follows the same logic. Money is made in the conversation about value, not in the efficiency of delivery, and a firm that prices time is selling the one thing the client should care about least.
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
Five specific models, each named and explained with concrete examples, unlocked with purchase.
Are you behaving like the expert or the vendor in this sale, and which of your own choices decided that?
5 more questions in Blair Enns's voice are unlocked with purchase.
Full list of anti-patterns unlocked with purchase.
The full framework adds: detailed explanations of all five mental models with real-world examples, the decision heuristics Blair Enns actually used, remaining signature questions, the complete list of anti-patterns, a copy-paste activation prompt, and a worked example.
Unlocked the moment you purchase. ~2,000 words total. Delivered as a Claude Skill and plain .md within 60 seconds of checkout.
- ✦Core philosophy: 2–3 sentences grounded in Blair Enns's documented worldview
- ✦Five signature mental models: each named, with concrete examples from their work
- ✦Decision heuristics: the concrete rules they actually used
- ✦Signature questions: five questions that sound like Blair Enns, not a generic MBA
- ✦What they would NOT do: the anti-patterns this framework rejects
- ✦Copy-paste activation prompt: drop straight into Claude or ChatGPT
- ✦Worked example: the framework applied to a realistic scenario
- →blair-enns.zip: a native Claude Skill. Upload to Settings → Skills in Claude, or unzip to
~/.claude/skills/ - →blair-enns-framework.md: plain markdown. Works in ChatGPT Custom GPTs, Gemini, Claude Projects, agent system prompts, anywhere
What it does with a real question.
A founder is deciding whether to take a large but difficult client.
Take the client only on your terms, and make them prove it. Size is the least interesting fact here. A large, difficult client is a power problem before it is a revenue opportunity: difficult buyers tend to treat vendors as interchangeable, and a founder who is hungry for the logo will behave like one. You will give in on scope, then on rate, then on who is allowed to say no, and within a year the account that looked like a windfall will be setting your priorities for you.
The test is whether you can behave like the expert in this sale rather than the vendor. Look at what you have already done. Have you presented ideas before anyone paid you? Have you complied with their procurement process without pushing back once? Has money been discussed, or are you circling it? If the answers are yes, yes, no, you are auditioning, and you should assume the engagement will feel the same.
So change the entry point. Propose a short paid diagnostic before any full commitment, and state your price range in the next conversation. A client who respects the boundary will tell you something good about the engagement ahead. One who bristles at paying for a diagnosis has answered your question cheaply.
Next move: this week, hold one conversation with the decision maker, not your day-to-day contact, and say plainly that you start with a paid diagnostic and what it costs. Their reaction is your decision.
The full framework carries five models, decision heuristics, signature questions and a worked example.
Written by claude-sonnet-5-5 with this framework loaded, 2026-10-11. Checked automatically for length and for copied framework text.
Save up to 40% with a bundle
Works as a Claude Skill (.zip) and as a plain .md for ChatGPT, Gemini & every LLM
Delivered to your email within 60 seconds · Secured by Stripe
Price includes UK VAT where applicable
Inspired by the documented thinking of Blair Enns. A mental-model toolkit, not a literal representation. Delivered as a .md file compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and any LLM.